It is currently 28 Jun 2017, 13:09



[Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

CasparCG Server, Client and development

Moderators: Macey, Jonas Hummelstrand, didikunz

[Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Jonas Hummelstrand » 29 Apr 2011, 11:25

If you are wondering what to run CasparCG Server on, please take a look at the wiki under System Requirements and System Recommendations.

For CasparCG Server 2.0, you'll need am Nvidia GPU (graphics card) capable of OpenGL 3.0. Please see the lists of nVidia graphics cards to make sure your card supports at least OpenGL 3.0 or higher.
Jonas Hummelstrand
Independent Consultant at SuperFly.tv
Former Community Manager for CasparCG

Problems? Guide to posting Bug reports & Feature requests
User avatar
Jonas Hummelstrand
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: 21 Apr 2009, 08:07
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: System recommendations for CasparCG Server

Postby Pimp Shanti » 17 Jun 2011, 17:00

Storage
Keep the OS and the CasparCG media on separate drives


Please could you explain how to do this so the media folder is still picked up by the Client?

Thank you
Pimp Shanti
 
Posts: 23
Joined: 17 Feb 2011, 07:41

Re: System recommendations for CasparCG Server

Postby Robert Nagy » 17 Jun 2011, 17:42

The client doesn't care where you put the media folder, its the server. You need to modify some values in the registry. Just search the registry for caspar and you will find the keys.

NOTE: This information is for the old CasparCG 1.0-1.8 Server.
CasparCG Integrator, Developer and Consultant
Former CasparCG Lead Developer
Feel free to contact me (ronag@live.com) if you need any CasparCG related support, development or other consulting.
Robert Nagy
 
Posts: 1271
Joined: 20 Apr 2009, 20:22
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: System recommendations for CasparCG Server

Postby Jonas Hummelstrand » 17 Jun 2011, 17:50

If you want the preview to work in the Client, I think you can change that in the settings. I never use the preview so I can't remember where you change it right now.
Jonas Hummelstrand
Independent Consultant at SuperFly.tv
Former Community Manager for CasparCG

Problems? Guide to posting Bug reports & Feature requests
User avatar
Jonas Hummelstrand
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: 21 Apr 2009, 08:07
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby go370 » 16 Dec 2011, 04:30

Because I've been having issues with my AMD/ATI build, I've decided to build an Intel/Nvidia based system. We plan to use it to do graphics and play clips/commericals in our broadcasts. We will be outputting 1 hdmi signal to an ATEM 1 M/E switcher. Would a card like the GeForce 210 paired with an i3 cpu work ok for my needs? Or, do I need a more powerful GFX card?
go370
 
Posts: 18
Joined: 13 Dec 2011, 05:43

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Robert Nagy » 16 Dec 2011, 08:56

I think that should be good enough. Though it depends a bit on what you want to run on the server.
CasparCG Integrator, Developer and Consultant
Former CasparCG Lead Developer
Feel free to contact me (ronag@live.com) if you need any CasparCG related support, development or other consulting.
Robert Nagy
 
Posts: 1271
Joined: 20 Apr 2009, 20:22
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby go370 » 16 Dec 2011, 17:53

Does CasperCG benefit from HyperThreading technology, or, will it in the future. I'm trying to make a decision on my cpu.
go370
 
Posts: 18
Joined: 13 Dec 2011, 05:43

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Robert Nagy » 16 Dec 2011, 23:32

CasparCG does benefit from HyperThreading.
CasparCG Integrator, Developer and Consultant
Former CasparCG Lead Developer
Feel free to contact me (ronag@live.com) if you need any CasparCG related support, development or other consulting.
Robert Nagy
 
Posts: 1271
Joined: 20 Apr 2009, 20:22
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby mathijs » 14 Jan 2012, 22:23

I'm doing some testing at the moment with CasparCG and think the videocard specs that are needed, need some clarification.
When I use a GF550Ti for instance, I get the server window flooded with the performance warning message that the host to device transfer was not completed. When I searched this forum I came to the conclusion that the meaning of this message is that the communication from the geforce card back to the system is slow and video stalling could occur.
While playing out a video I already get the message but the picture looks fine, when I start the fotbolls app and start a crawler with the scoreboard graphics enabled, I can see the text hickup and not slide smoothly.

When I monitor my system and GPU at that moment, the CPU cores are all under 50% and the GPU is also not above 50% load. So the slow communication from the GPU back to the system is really stalling the performance and capabilities of the system.

In the topic I found the explanation of the warning message, there is quite clearly stated that it is best to use a Quadro Nvidia card, because those would not suffer from this problem.

My conclusion so far: "Let's get a Quadro card!"

Now the question arises, which one do I need that is upto doing the job flawlessly, but is no overkill so my wallet won't get more empty than needed. You can spend money only one time and then you need to make new money again.
Because in this business there always is a lot on the wanted list, making good choices the first time is a pre.

Looking at the Quadro variants at the moment, my eye falls onto the Quadro 2000. It is under 400 euro's new which is quite cheap for a workstation card.
Can someone confirm this card to be perfectly capable of doing what I expect from it, which is performing well enough to make the limit of the system like it should be, without a bottleneck on the communications which happens with Nvidia cards meant for the gaming market?

There also are a lot of older cards to be found at webshops which are old stock that are sold cheap, or second hand on ebay for instance.
When I'm looking into the model numbering of these cards, I get a little frustrated about the missing of a numbering system that makes it easy to tell which is better than the other. In my opinion it makes no sense how they are numbered now.
Which versions are confirmed capable of making CasparCG running well?
mathijs
 
Posts: 8
Joined: 14 Jan 2012, 18:10

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Robert Nagy » 14 Jan 2012, 23:58

We have used the following models successfully:

    Quadro 2000
    Quadro FX 1800
    Quadro FX 1700

-----------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE: The following is just guesses.

Regarding the Geforce family of cards. I believe the problem is related to the new Geforce Fermi architecture (500 series) which has for some reason throttled the OpenGL memory transfer function glReadPixels. An older pre-Fermi Geforce card (e.g. 400 series) I believe should work just fine.
CasparCG Integrator, Developer and Consultant
Former CasparCG Lead Developer
Feel free to contact me (ronag@live.com) if you need any CasparCG related support, development or other consulting.
Robert Nagy
 
Posts: 1271
Joined: 20 Apr 2009, 20:22
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby mathijs » 15 Jan 2012, 06:01

I just did a test to check if you are a good guesser and can confirm it to be true.
With a Geforce260GTX I had lying around, the problem is gone.
mathijs
 
Posts: 8
Joined: 14 Jan 2012, 18:10

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Robert Nagy » 15 Jan 2012, 06:09

mathijs wrote:I just did a test to check if you are a good guesser and can confirm it to be true.
With a Geforce260GTX I had lying around, the problem is gone.


Thanks for verifying!
CasparCG Integrator, Developer and Consultant
Former CasparCG Lead Developer
Feel free to contact me (ronag@live.com) if you need any CasparCG related support, development or other consulting.
Robert Nagy
 
Posts: 1271
Joined: 20 Apr 2009, 20:22
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby kiddigital » 16 Jan 2012, 20:01

Using a GF GTS450 and a GF GT440 without any issues so far (using fullscreen screen consumer in 1080i5000).
Running Caspar for a local dutch station using DeckLink 3D+ broadcasting HD (1080i) and SD (PAL 576i) and a test rig with Intenisty Pro...
User avatar
kiddigital
 
Posts: 45
Joined: 26 Oct 2010, 18:20
Location: Netherlands

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby mathijs » 17 Jan 2012, 04:54

So only the 5 series is affected, let's hope the next architecture won't have this limitation.
mathijs
 
Posts: 8
Joined: 14 Jan 2012, 18:10

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby vimlesh1975 » 22 Jan 2012, 11:39

I have gigabyte motherboard,4gb ram, i5 processor, Intel hd display adapter. no output card. Casparcg 2.0b3 using CPU uses 30%. Is it abnormal?
User avatar
vimlesh1975
 
Posts: 602
Joined: 29 Aug 2011, 11:42
Location: Doordarshan, Mumbai, India

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Robert Nagy » 22 Jan 2012, 13:01

vimlesh1975 wrote:I have gigabyte motherboard,4gb ram, i5 processor, Intel hd display adapter. no output card. Casparcg 2.0b3 using CPU uses 30%. Is it abnormal?


Depends entirely on what you are playing...
CasparCG Integrator, Developer and Consultant
Former CasparCG Lead Developer
Feel free to contact me (ronag@live.com) if you need any CasparCG related support, development or other consulting.
Robert Nagy
 
Posts: 1271
Joined: 20 Apr 2009, 20:22
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby vimlesh1975 » 24 Jan 2012, 13:42

casparcg is using CPU uses 30% in idle mode i.e. without any playing.
User avatar
vimlesh1975
 
Posts: 602
Joined: 29 Aug 2011, 11:42
Location: Doordarshan, Mumbai, India

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Robert Nagy » 24 Jan 2012, 13:50

vimlesh1975: That is normal, even though your not playing anything CasparCG will still display and process a "black" videostream. This is especially true when running an interlaced format with the screen producer since it always will deinterlace the stream.
CasparCG Integrator, Developer and Consultant
Former CasparCG Lead Developer
Feel free to contact me (ronag@live.com) if you need any CasparCG related support, development or other consulting.
Robert Nagy
 
Posts: 1271
Joined: 20 Apr 2009, 20:22
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby respectTheCode » 09 Sep 2012, 20:54

Jonas Hummelstrand wrote:If you are wondering what to run CasparCG Server on, please take a look at the wiki and the article Supported Hardware.


The link is broken. I think it should go to http://casparcg.com/wiki/CasparCG_Server#System_Recommendations.
Kevin
User avatar
respectTheCode
 
Posts: 127
Joined: 11 Aug 2012, 13:27
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Jonas Hummelstrand » 09 Sep 2012, 22:21

Thanks for noticing and reporting it! Trying to organize things in a wiki is a pain in the ass, all the links break! :oops:
Jonas Hummelstrand
Independent Consultant at SuperFly.tv
Former Community Manager for CasparCG

Problems? Guide to posting Bug reports & Feature requests
User avatar
Jonas Hummelstrand
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: 21 Apr 2009, 08:07
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby vimlesh1975 » 15 Sep 2012, 13:32

I upgraded the onboard intel hd graphics driver to version 8.15.10.2761
now casparcg 2.0 is using 3% cpu.
User avatar
vimlesh1975
 
Posts: 602
Joined: 29 Aug 2011, 11:42
Location: Doordarshan, Mumbai, India

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Jonas Hummelstrand » 15 Sep 2012, 20:45

Do you find that CasparCG Server 2.0 works without any problems with the Intel HD graphics card? Is it a 3000 or a 4000?
Have you tried using all the GPU features in the Mixer, such as Blend modes?
Jonas Hummelstrand
Independent Consultant at SuperFly.tv
Former Community Manager for CasparCG

Problems? Guide to posting Bug reports & Feature requests
User avatar
Jonas Hummelstrand
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: 21 Apr 2009, 08:07
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby vimlesh1975 » 16 Sep 2012, 04:55

I am using it for screen consumer only. No video card. It plays, record, plays graphics, All mixer command works without any problem. it is onboard intel(R) hd graphics 2000. It supports OpenGL 3.1.0
User avatar
vimlesh1975
 
Posts: 602
Joined: 29 Aug 2011, 11:42
Location: Doordarshan, Mumbai, India

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby vimlesh1975 » 01 Nov 2012, 11:16

Jonas Hummelstrand wrote:Have you tried using all the GPU features in the Mixer, such as Blend modes?


Blend mode doesn't work on my onboard intel(R) hd graphics 2000
User avatar
vimlesh1975
 
Posts: 602
Joined: 29 Aug 2011, 11:42
Location: Doordarshan, Mumbai, India

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby didikunz » 01 Nov 2012, 11:35

vimlesh1975 wrote:I upgraded the onboard intel hd graphics driver to version 8.15.10.2761
now casparcg 2.0 is using 3% cpu.

What version of CasparCG do you use for this? 2.0 or 2.1?
Didi Kunz
CasparCG Client-Programmer, Template Maker & Live CG-Operator
Media Support, CH-5722 Gränichen, Switzerland http://mediasupport.ch/
Problems? Guide to posting Bug reports & Feature requests
User avatar
didikunz
 
Posts: 3480
Joined: 10 May 2010, 09:08
Location: Aarau, Switzerland

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby vimlesh1975 » 01 Nov 2012, 11:38

2.0 stable
User avatar
vimlesh1975
 
Posts: 602
Joined: 29 Aug 2011, 11:42
Location: Doordarshan, Mumbai, India

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby PaulGregory » 16 Nov 2012, 16:19

I too have on-board Intel which works fine in 2.0 stable, but not with a recent build of 2.1.

The System Requirements in the wiki specify an NVIDIA GPU, but the Recommendations are vaguer. The opening post in this thread quotes an older version of the wiki and suggests ATI/AMD graphics cards are an option for 2.0.

I gather that in older versions, the GPU spec was less of an issue if the screen consumer was not being used.

Is this a trend? Is it the case that the final 2.1 will require an NVIDIA card more than 2.0 does? Is the removal of ATI/AMD a result of feedback from 2.0 or development of 2.1?
PaulGregory
 
Posts: 10
Joined: 17 Oct 2012, 09:57

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Jonas Hummelstrand » 16 Nov 2012, 16:27

Thanks for pontning that out, I've now updated the original post.

We've worked with ATI/AMD and from what I'm gathering, CasparCG Server 2.1 will run on both ATI/AMD and Nvidia GPUs that support OpenGL 3.0.

CasparCG Server 2.1 will also have a CPU fallback so you can start it and use the basic functions even without a supported GPU.
Jonas Hummelstrand
Independent Consultant at SuperFly.tv
Former Community Manager for CasparCG

Problems? Guide to posting Bug reports & Feature requests
User avatar
Jonas Hummelstrand
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: 21 Apr 2009, 08:07
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby mike » 17 Jan 2013, 15:40

Small heads up: if anyone else is planning on running CasparCG 2.0.3 on a mid range i3 with 1GB of RAM and intel HD4000 onboard graphics, then it works well enough for SD content, but don't expect stutter-less playback. - I'm installing on a large number of machines around the building, so people can prepare and check content offline - rather than trust their flash previews...
mike
 
Posts: 16
Joined: 17 Oct 2012, 23:31

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Jonas Hummelstrand » 17 Jan 2013, 16:11

That does sound like a pretty minimal machine configuration. Glad to hear it works for SD, though!
Jonas Hummelstrand
Independent Consultant at SuperFly.tv
Former Community Manager for CasparCG

Problems? Guide to posting Bug reports & Feature requests
User avatar
Jonas Hummelstrand
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: 21 Apr 2009, 08:07
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby henny » 05 Feb 2013, 23:12

Hi all I'm currnetley toying with the the idea of throwing together a dedicated pc for Caspar

The pc I currentley use has a different purpose in life as a watchout display pc and as it happened to have a decklink pci card in it does what I need it to.The problems come when I need that pc for other work I'm stuck for a Caspar rig

I have a spare original decklink extreme pci avaibale but I want to know what of the older deck link cards will do separate key and fill as I only need SD and don't have the budget for the latest 3d card so I'm probey going to pickup somthing second hand

I currentley use the internal key in the cards. I would like to get away from this If possible

Cheers
henny
 
Posts: 36
Joined: 15 Feb 2012, 10:32

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Alb » 14 Feb 2013, 09:34

Hi!

Any estimation on when CasparCG Server 2.1 will be available?

Regards and thanks for your great work.
Alb
 
Posts: 2
Joined: 17 Dec 2012, 00:57

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Jonas Hummelstrand » 14 Feb 2013, 16:58

Alb wrote:Any estimation on when CasparCG Server 2.1 will be available?

It is available for testing, but currently in an alpha version, from http://builds.casparcg.com/
First install CasparCG Server 2.0.3 and then replace the files from the alpha build. Remember, it is alpha version, we do not recommend you use it for any real production.
Jonas Hummelstrand
Independent Consultant at SuperFly.tv
Former Community Manager for CasparCG

Problems? Guide to posting Bug reports & Feature requests
User avatar
Jonas Hummelstrand
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: 21 Apr 2009, 08:07
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Joep » 21 Feb 2013, 15:18

Hi,

I would like to buy a system which is capable of running 1 HD channel with key and fill. I selected the following hardware. Can you confirm this system is powerfull enough?

MOBO: MSI B75A-G43 (B75 chipset)
CPU: Intel Core i3 3240 (dual-core 3,4ghz, is this better than a core i5 with more cores but less ghz?)
GPU: Quadro 2000 (would an quadro 600 also be good enough?)
MEM: Corsair 8GB (1333mhz, CL9)
HDD for OS: OCZ Vertex 3 60GB (on sata2 bus)
HDD for storage: OCZ Vertex3 240GB (on sata3 bus)


Thanks!
Joep
 
Posts: 26
Joined: 11 Dec 2012, 18:23

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Jonas Hummelstrand » 21 Feb 2013, 16:14

An i3 sounds a bit suspicious to me. You can't compare the processing power by just comparing the clock frequency between an i3 and an i5 (or an i7.) For example, an i5 (and i7) have Turbo Boost which will likely mean that they can outperform an i3 even at a lower stock clock frequency. http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/3 ... i3_i5_i7_/

For $100 more you can get an i7-2700K instead.
You can't see much difference in the specs, but GeekBench scores show that it has almost twice the performance of the CPU you suggested.


While you should be able to use an Nvidia GTX 670 instead of a Quadro 2000 card, we can only recommend hardware that we have tried and tested, hence our System Requirements and System Recommendations.

To be able to output fill + key in HD, you will need either a Bluefish Technologies card, or a BlackMagic Design DeckLink HD Extreme 3D card.
Jonas Hummelstrand
Independent Consultant at SuperFly.tv
Former Community Manager for CasparCG

Problems? Guide to posting Bug reports & Feature requests
User avatar
Jonas Hummelstrand
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: 21 Apr 2009, 08:07
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Joep » 21 Feb 2013, 19:06

Hi Jonas,

Thanks for your response!

I will replace the CPU with an i7-2700K and choose for the Quadro 2000. I have indeed a Blackmagic Decklink HD Extreme 3D for the HD-SDI signals.

Will the system then be good enough for a HD channel fill + key?
Joep
 
Posts: 26
Joined: 11 Dec 2012, 18:23

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Jonas Hummelstrand » 21 Feb 2013, 20:23

That should work great (but like I said, we can only recommend what we have tested ourselves!) If you run in to bottlenecks, they are usually:
1. CPU for Flash templates (Flash Player that we host in what we call "TemplateHost" is single-threaded, and it's really easy to create things in a way that bogs down Flash, if you don't know what you are doing.
2. Disk for HD files, depending on what codecs you use.
Jonas Hummelstrand
Independent Consultant at SuperFly.tv
Former Community Manager for CasparCG

Problems? Guide to posting Bug reports & Feature requests
User avatar
Jonas Hummelstrand
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: 21 Apr 2009, 08:07
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Joep » 21 Feb 2013, 20:38

Thanks! What codec(s) do you recommend for HD video with alphachannel?
Joep
 
Posts: 26
Joined: 11 Dec 2012, 18:23

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Jonas Hummelstrand » 21 Feb 2013, 21:54

If you had even faster disks, you could use QuickTime Animation @ 80-90%. If you create two separate files (works woth any codec, but for small files choose H.264 MP4s) and name the alpha channel file with the same name plus _a, it will automatically be used to create an alpha channel.

Example: Video.mp4 when loaded and played by CasparCG Server 2.x will automatically get its alpha channel from the greyscale (actually I think we use the R channel) values of Video_a.mp4 if they are placed in the same directory.
Jonas Hummelstrand
Independent Consultant at SuperFly.tv
Former Community Manager for CasparCG

Problems? Guide to posting Bug reports & Feature requests
User avatar
Jonas Hummelstrand
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: 21 Apr 2009, 08:07
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Joep » 22 Feb 2013, 11:15

Jonas Hummelstrand wrote:If you had even faster disks, you could use QuickTime Animation @ 80-90%. If you create two separate files (works woth any codec, but for small files choose H.264 MP4s) and name the alpha channel file with the same name plus _a, it will automatically be used to create an alpha channel.


Can you tell me how fast a disk needs to be? The OCZ Vertex can read at more then 300MB/Sec.

I also would like to use audio from the output channel. Is it possible to use the AES output from the Decklink Extreme? Will the audio be in sync?
Joep
 
Posts: 26
Joined: 11 Dec 2012, 18:23

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Jonas Hummelstrand » 22 Feb 2013, 11:20

Joep wrote:Can you tell me how fast a disk needs to be? The OCZ Vertex can read at more then 300MB/Sec.

That depends on your videos. Sorry, it's impossible to say...

Joep wrote:I also would like to use audio from the output channel. Is it possible to use the AES output from the Decklink Extreme? Will the audio be in sync?

We only use SDI-embedded audio, but I believe the AES/EBU output works just as well (I've never heard anything contrary.)
Jonas Hummelstrand
Independent Consultant at SuperFly.tv
Former Community Manager for CasparCG

Problems? Guide to posting Bug reports & Feature requests
User avatar
Jonas Hummelstrand
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: 21 Apr 2009, 08:07
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby beans_michael » 27 Jun 2013, 16:32

Hi Guys,

I´ve got a short question regarding the SVTs System Recommendations: Why are there two Decklink cards mentioned?

"2 pcs. BlackMagic Design DeckLink 4K Extreme SDI video cards"

If one card outputs fill and key in different channels in perfect sync, what would I need a second Decklink for?

Thanks in advance, Michael
beans_michael
 
Posts: 1
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 16:25

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Jonas Hummelstrand » 27 Jun 2013, 16:41

You don't need two cards, but our main studio complex now has 10 servers, each with two DeckLink HD Extreme 3D cards, so each server can output two simultaneous 1080i50 fill+key SDI streams, giving us 20 simultaneous fill+key channels for our five studios.
Jonas Hummelstrand
Independent Consultant at SuperFly.tv
Former Community Manager for CasparCG

Problems? Guide to posting Bug reports & Feature requests
User avatar
Jonas Hummelstrand
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: 21 Apr 2009, 08:07
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Mario_lagos » 27 Jun 2013, 16:48

Hi,
I found this software like 2 days ago, and I really want to try it, but I have a concern about the graphics card that I need to run caspar server, I planned to buy a Nvidia GTX 770 or a 670 4GB gdr5, I want to know if someone test this card with Caspar cg, I want to build the system for run HD lower Third logos and social media content live, we already have a Mac Pro with 2 cards, one decklink studio 2 and a decklink quadro and I think it will work fine, but the problem is the graphic card (AMD/ATI). can this Mac work for server with dual boot in windows?

I really want to thanks for the software it look amazing and I really want to try give it a try, and give feedback to you about how it work for us.

sorry for my english, Im from Honduras. saludos!
Mario_lagos
 
Posts: 2
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 16:35

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Jonas Hummelstrand » 27 Jun 2013, 20:13

We will release CasparCG Server 2.0.4 beta 1 within a few days, and it has support for ATI GPUs (but it hasn't been tested with many cards, so we can't promise that it will work!)
A Mac Pro booted into Windows 7 should work fine, and hopefully your ATI card will work as well.
Jonas Hummelstrand
Independent Consultant at SuperFly.tv
Former Community Manager for CasparCG

Problems? Guide to posting Bug reports & Feature requests
User avatar
Jonas Hummelstrand
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: 21 Apr 2009, 08:07
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Mario_lagos » 28 Jun 2013, 23:44

Thanks Jonas,
That great news hope it works with my card, just one more question, we like to display live social media tweets and facebook comments from our page, it seems that Caspercg work well with flash, do you know if someone in the forum made something similar to this? I think we must find a developer to make the flash template right?
Mario_lagos
 
Posts: 2
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 16:35

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby tomj » 29 Jun 2013, 15:39

Hey,

moschops and I created a twitter scroller which will automatically pull down tweets that match a customizable hashtag and the custom client lets you pick and queue which tweets you want to send to the scroller.

There's more information with a screen shot of the current client at viewtopic.php?f=9&t=377#p9287 and here's a video of it being used: http://youtu.be/Fmy8QrtkuLM?t=25m28s

At the moment it is just twitter but we would be happy to make one that works in a similar fashion with facebook as well.

Please let us know if you are interested.
tomj
 
Posts: 227
Joined: 20 Mar 2013, 23:31
Location: Lancaster, UK

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby iTech » 03 Jul 2013, 05:40

tomj wrote:Hey,

moschops and I created a twitter scroller which will automatically pull down tweets that match a customizable hashtag and the custom client lets you pick and queue which tweets you want to send to the scroller.

There's more information with a screen shot of the current client at viewtopic.php?f=9&t=377#p9287 and here's a video of it being used: http://youtu.be/Fmy8QrtkuLM?t=25m28s

At the moment it is just twitter but we would be happy to make one that works in a similar fashion with facebook as well.

Please let us know if you are interested.


I made something similar to that along with a live Facebook poll.

Examples:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxRNePQHfTs&hd=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saMWMedE5ag&&hd=1
iTech
 
Posts: 132
Joined: 11 Aug 2012, 17:54

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Jonas Hummelstrand » 08 Jul 2013, 10:33

CasparCG Server 2.0.4b1 is available now, and has experimental support for ATI/AMD graphics cards.
Jonas Hummelstrand
Independent Consultant at SuperFly.tv
Former Community Manager for CasparCG

Problems? Guide to posting Bug reports & Feature requests
User avatar
Jonas Hummelstrand
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: 21 Apr 2009, 08:07
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Kibim » 02 Aug 2013, 11:55

After a lot of reading and experimenting, i've Installed a CasparCG system to test on my Laptop!

I've got a Sony Vaio F1, Core I7, HDMI out NVidia with Cuda, and an SSD Sys Drive.
I was amazed that the server runs, in HD mode via the HDMI output in interlaced into my Vision Mixer. I was able to do most of the real-time blend/cc functions with no hassle, for about 2 minutes. Then the system overheats and dies! In SD mode get about 10minutes of play-time before the system dies.

So after enough experimentation, i've decided to build a dedicated machine to run Caspar.

What I wanted to ask, is with a SINGLE BMD-decklink card, can I still do Live video in and out simultaneously, or do I need 2 cards for that? (the new 4k extreme)

Thanks!
Kibim
 
Posts: 49
Joined: 25 Jul 2013, 19:59
Location: South Africa

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Kibim » 02 Aug 2013, 12:07

I also just wanted to check if the new Quadro K2000 is supported. The Quadro 2000 is getting a little old now with the K2000 being only $50 more, but having nearly double the processing power.
Kibim
 
Posts: 49
Joined: 25 Jul 2013, 19:59
Location: South Africa

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby mcdikki » 02 Aug 2013, 12:39

You can use each decklink card only as in OR output, not as both at the same time.
So no, a single card with single channel does not fit your needs.
Depending on your needs, your could use a card which has more than one channel like the BlackmagicDesgin Decklink Duo or Quadro. But with this cards, you won't get synced key+fill out.
Please have a look at http://www.editgrid.com/user/hummelstra ... CG%29.html.
There you can check which card is sufficient for what.

I think there are some people here around using the k2000 without any problems. Did you try a forum search for it?

cheers
mcdikki
sublan.tv - Wir teilen Begeisterung
User avatar
mcdikki
 
Posts: 1059
Joined: 11 Dec 2012, 15:48
Location: Germany

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby Kibim » 02 Aug 2013, 13:18

Thank you for the quick reply mcdikki.

The BMD decklink quad is a tempting option. The lack of synced fill+key could prove an issue however.

It would appear that a nice system to use would be a Decklink 4k Extreme as an output device with a Decklink Duo/Quad as an input.
Kibim
 
Posts: 49
Joined: 25 Jul 2013, 19:59
Location: South Africa

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby mcdikki » 02 Aug 2013, 14:06

Kibim wrote:...
It would appear that a nice system to use would be a Decklink 4k Extreme as an output device with a Decklink Duo/Quad as an input.


Yes, this is what I would use if I need inputs ;-)

cheers
mcdikki
Last edited by mcdikki on 02 Aug 2013, 17:52, edited 1 time in total.
sublan.tv - Wir teilen Begeisterung
User avatar
mcdikki
 
Posts: 1059
Joined: 11 Dec 2012, 15:48
Location: Germany

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby didikunz » 02 Aug 2013, 14:39

Kibim wrote:Thank you for the quick reply mcdikki.

The BMD decklink quad is a tempting option. The lack of synced fill+key could prove an issue however.

It would appear that a nice system to use would be a Decklink 4k Extreme as an output device with a Decklink Duo/Quad as an input.


I would use the Extreme 4K as output, because it has synced fill & key. A quad for input is good. With this config you only need two free PCIe 4x slot for 4 inputs and one output with fill & key.
Didi Kunz
CasparCG Client-Programmer, Template Maker & Live CG-Operator
Media Support, CH-5722 Gränichen, Switzerland http://mediasupport.ch/
Problems? Guide to posting Bug reports & Feature requests
User avatar
didikunz
 
Posts: 3480
Joined: 10 May 2010, 09:08
Location: Aarau, Switzerland

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby palco » 02 Sep 2013, 07:04

If I use the output as a stream, what do I need for an input of the Declink card.
palco
 
Posts: 48
Joined: 24 Aug 2013, 18:45

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby didikunz » 02 Sep 2013, 07:35

A Decklink SDI will do the job.
Didi Kunz
CasparCG Client-Programmer, Template Maker & Live CG-Operator
Media Support, CH-5722 Gränichen, Switzerland http://mediasupport.ch/
Problems? Guide to posting Bug reports & Feature requests
User avatar
didikunz
 
Posts: 3480
Joined: 10 May 2010, 09:08
Location: Aarau, Switzerland

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby palco » 02 Sep 2013, 07:54

didikunz wrote:A Decklink SDI will do the job.

Thanks,
But Decklink SDI for digital input signal.
Would it be Decklink Intensity PRO, that supports analog signal, or must Deklink Studio.
palco
 
Posts: 48
Joined: 24 Aug 2013, 18:45

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby didikunz » 02 Sep 2013, 09:04

palco wrote:
didikunz wrote:A Decklink SDI will do the job.

Thanks,
But Decklink SDI for digital input signal.
Would it be Decklink Intensity PRO, that supports analog signal, or must Deklink Studio.

That comes out, when you don't say what you need. If you need analog in, then you need a Decklink Studio, a 4K or an Intensity. Remember, that the Intensity only has consumer grade inputs. That means no balanced audio and only chich connectors.
Didi Kunz
CasparCG Client-Programmer, Template Maker & Live CG-Operator
Media Support, CH-5722 Gränichen, Switzerland http://mediasupport.ch/
Problems? Guide to posting Bug reports & Feature requests
User avatar
didikunz
 
Posts: 3480
Joined: 10 May 2010, 09:08
Location: Aarau, Switzerland

Re: [Sticky] CasparCG 2.0 - System recommendations

Postby farhad.nematy » 09 Sep 2013, 09:11

hello every body

i want to buy a server computer to run casparcg server on it

what hardware is good???
i read the system recommendations

is there any other tested server??
nothing is impossible
farhad.nematy
 
Posts: 167
Joined: 24 Jul 2013, 06:00

Next

Return to Tech and Development

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests